Geoengineering: Reversing Global Warming

blog for secret of neptune

2011-12-14T05:04:00.000-08:00

I have dedicated a blog to The Secret of Neptune:

http://neptunesecret.blogspot.com/

The Secret Of Neptune: The Tuareg Trident

2011-12-13T23:53:00.001-08:00

Above: Photograph Of a Tuareg Trident

Excerpt From : "The Secret Of Neptune” Followed by Interview with the Author

Chapter 4: Meaning of the Tuareg Trident

Leonard set upon that same Algerian desert once again by camel for the Hogar Mountains, with the same tribal guide, named Juba, as before.

Leonard said to him:

“This is truly a beautiful land where you reside.”

He answered:

“Nature, my friend, is the basis for which all life exists.”

Leonard answered:

“Correction. Nature is the reason we exist.”

The guide came back with:

“Truer words have never been spoken.”

“So tell me, Juba, what do you think that symbol you wear around your neck means?”

“Leonard, I know what it means. Many mistake it for an African version of the Christian Cross, but it is really a trident, a three-pronged weapon with a handle. It means there is another way to save humanity without sacrificing oneself, however it is not in that it is a weapon as much as it is a key. Further, it takes a special person to find the door to which it fits.”

“Juba, you know the Roman Sea God, Neptune, carried a trident. Could that trident be the key to setting sail upon the cosmic ocean. The settlement of space would save humanity.”

Juba answered, “Perhaps you, Leonard, are that special person.”

The Secret Of Neptune: Interview with Ian Beardsley

Interviewer: Ian, you believe that the planet Neptune holds a clue as to the fate of the Earth, and that it is no coincidence that the planet is named after the Roman Sea God, because we must one day sail the cosmic ocean to survive as a species. Do you want to elaborate on that?

Ian: We have an equation for a sequence that shows the Earth straddled between Venus and Mars. Venus is a failed Earth. Mars promises to be New Earth. The equation that I presented in my work: The Secret Of Neptune, is:

Venus orbit divided by earth orbit times earth mass divided by mars mass, all that times n minus the mars orbital number equals the nth term of the sequence.

I call it The Neptune Equation.

The Mars orbital number is 4. If we want to know what planet in the solar system holds the key to the success of Earth, or to the success of humans, we let n =3 in the Neptune equation since the Earth is the third planet out from the Sun, and the result is that the third term = 17.6. This means the planet that holds the key is Neptune. It has a mass of 17.23 earth masses, a number very close to our 17.6.

Not only is Neptune the indicated planet, I found it had nearly the same surface gravity as earth. Though it is much more massive than earth, it is much larger. That was why it comes out to have the same surface gravity.

Interviewer: I see, and how did you derive The Neptune Equation?

Ian: It started with my discovery of nine fifths in the Universe. It is in the orbit of Saturn at its closest approach to the Sun compared to the orbit of Jupiter at its closest approach to the Sun. That calibration puts the earth mystically at one unit from the Sun. Jupiter and Saturn are the largest planets in the solar system and named after the Roman and Greek Gods of the Gods.
As well the ratio of the molar masses of Gold to Silver is nine-fifths, and the ratio of the Sun’s radius to the moon’s orbital radius is nine-fifths.

Once I had discovered this enigma of nine-fifths in the Universe I guessed we were not just dealing with nine-fifths, but any whole number multiple of nine-fifths, or any whole number multiple of 1.8 in other words. That is I wrote the sequence:

1.8, 3.6, 5.4, 7.2, and on…

It did turn out to be an expression of the solar system as a whole.

I took, as well, the sequence where you start with five, then add nine to each successive term, which is:

5, 14, 23, 32, and on…

I then took the difference between these two sequences to arrive at a third sequence, which is:

3.2, 10.4, 17.6, 24.8, and on…

That is an arithmetic sequence that can be written 7.2n minus 4 equals the nth term. That is the Neptune equation.

Interviewer: You also claim your work indicates we are here for a reason.

Ian: Yes, I find that my enigmatic discovery of nine-fifths in the solar system and nature, unifies the two most important ratios in mathematics, pi, which is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter and the golden ratio, which is the ratio you obtain by dividing a line such that the whole compared to the longer section is the same as the longer section compared to the shorter section.

Pi is 3.141 to three places after the decimal and the golden ratio is 1.618 to three places after the decimal. If we add those two values, we get 4.759.

Considering the important part, the values after the decimal, which is the fraction, the seven is the average of nine and five and the next term is 5 and the one after that is 9. It is further interesting that the fourth and fifth digits after the decimal in pi are five and nine respectively.

So I conclude that since the solar system unifies pi and the golden ratio through nine-fifths, that we are here for a reason. I think it is no mistake that the solar system has such a structure. Though I have no clue as to what could have had a hand in bringing this about. Knowing we are here for a reason, the next logical question to ask is: what is that reason? There is much more to this story, and I have covered it in my booklet Are Humans Alone In The Universe And Are They Here For A Reason published at lulu dot com in paperback, and is available for free download at Issuu and Scribd. It is at Issuu under author eanbardsley and at scribd under author Ian Beardsley. The first three chapters of my Novel: The Secret Of Neptune, which explores these discoveries through fiction, is also available at Issuu and Scribd.

Here are the links:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/74002965/The-Secret-of-Neptune

http://issuu.com/eanbardsley/docs/the_secret_of_neptune

http://www.scribd.com/doc/70000812/Are-Humans-Alone-In-The-Universe-And-Are-They-Here-For-A-Reason-02

http://issuu.com/eanbardsley/docs/exobiology_01

http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/are-humans-alone-in-the-universe-and-are-they-here-for-a-reason/18194113

Friday, December 9 2011

The Author

2011-12-13T15:10:00.001-08:00

The Nine-Fifths Phenomenon

2011-12-09T21:17:00.000-08:00

The Secret Of Neptune: Interview with Ian Beardsley

Interviewer: Ian, you believe that the planet Neptune holds a clue as to the fate of the Earth, and that it is no coincidence that the planet is named after the Roman Sea God, because we must one day sail the cosmic ocean to survive as a species. Do you want to elaborate on that?

Ian: We have an equation for a sequence that shows the Earth straddled between Venus and Mars. Venus is a failed Earth. Mars promises to be New Earth. The equation that I presented in my work: The Secret Of Neptune, is:

Venus orbit divided by earth orbit times earth mass divided by mars mass, all that times n minus the mars orbital number equals the nth term of the sequence.

I call it The Neptune Equation.

The Mars orbital number is 4. If we want to know what planet in the solar system holds the key to the success of Earth, or to the success of humans, we let n =3 in the Neptune equation since the Earth is the third planet out from the Sun, and the result is that the third term = 17.6. This means the planet that holds the key is Neptune. It has a mass of 17.23 earth masses, a number very close to our 17.6.

Not only is Neptune the indicated planet, I found it had nearly the same surface gravity as earth. Though it is much more massive than earth, it is much larger. That was why it comes out to have the same surface gravity.

Interviewer: I see, and how did you derive The Neptune Equation?

Ian: It started with my discovery of nine fifths in the Universe. It is in the orbit of Saturn at its closest approach to the Sun compared to the orbit of Jupiter at its closest approach to the Sun. That calibration puts the earth mystically at one unit from the Sun. Jupiter and Saturn are the largest planets in the solar system and named after the Roman and Greek Gods of the Gods.
As well the ratio of the molar masses of Gold to Silver is nine-fifths, and the ratio of the Sun’s radius to the moon’s orbital radius is nine-fifths.

Once I had discovered this enigma of nine-fifths in the Universe I guessed we were not just dealing with nine-fifths, but any whole number multiple of nine-fifths, or any whole number multiple of 1.8 in other words. That is I wrote the sequence:

1.8, 3.6, 5.4, 7.2, and on…

It did turn out to be an expression of the solar system as a whole.

I took, as well, the sequence where you start with five, then add nine to each successive term, which is:

5, 14, 23, 32, and on…

I then took the difference between these two sequences to arrive at a third sequence, which is:

3.2, 10.4, 17.6, 24.8, and on…

That is an arithmetic sequence that can be written 7.2n minus 4 equals the nth term. That is the Neptune equation.

Interviewer: You also claim your work indicates we are here for a reason.

Ian: Yes, I find that my enigmatic discovery of nine-fifths in the solar system and nature, unifies the two most important ratios in mathematics, pi, which is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter and the golden ratio, which is the ratio you obtain by dividing a line such that the whole compared to the longer section is the same as the longer section compared to the shorter section.

Pi is 3.141 to three places after the decimal and the golden ratio is 1.618 to three places after the decimal. If we add those two values, we get 4.759.

Considering the important part, the values after the decimal, which is the fraction, the seven is the average of nine and five and the next term is 5 and the one after that is 9. It is further interesting that the fourth and fifth digits after the decimal in pi are five and nine respectively.

So I conclude that since the solar system unifies pi and the golden ratio through nine-fifths, that we are here for a reason. I think it is no mistake that the solar system has such a structure. Though I have no clue as to what could have had a hand in bringing this about. Knowing we are here for a reason, the next logical question to ask is: what is that reason? There is much more to this story, and I have covered it in my booklet Are Humans Alone In The Universe And Are They Here For A Reason published at lulu dot com in paperback, and is available for free download at Issuu and Scribd. It is at Issuu under author eanbardsley and at scribd under author Ian Beardsley. The first three chapters of my Novel: The Secret Of Neptune, which explores these discoveries through fiction, is also available at Issuu and Scribd.

Here are the links:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/74002965/The-Secret-of-Neptune

http://issuu.com/eanbardsley/docs/the_secret_of_neptune

http://www.scribd.com/doc/70000812/Are-Humans-Alone-In-The-Universe-And-Are-They-Here-For-A-Reason-02

http://issuu.com/eanbardsley/docs/exobiology_01

http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/are-humans-alone-in-the-universe-and-are-they-here-for-a-reason/18194113

Friday, December 9 2011

Chapter 4: The Secret Of Neptune

2011-11-30T15:50:00.000-08:00

Chapter 4: The Secret of Neptune

Leonard set upon that same Algerian desert once again by camel for the Hogar Mountains, with the same tribal guide as before.

Leonard said to him:

“This is truly a beautiful land where you reside.”

He answered:

“Nature, my friend, is the basis for which all life exists.”

Leonard answered:

“Correction. Nature is the reason we exist.”

The guide came back with:

“Truer words have never been spoken.”

These Two Works Are Available For Download

2011-11-26T17:23:00.000-08:00

The the following two books are now available for download. They can be downloaded by opening the publications and clicking on the download icons. Actually, it would seem you open the publication and click on the print icon, and it will take you to a print option. Click on print and it will download.

Open publication - Free publishing - More astrobiology

Open publication - Free publishing - More asimov

Mayan Prophecy Of 2012 True In A Good Sense?

2011-11-11T04:51:00.000-08:00

We can already see, whether coincidence or not, that the Mayan Prophecy that the world as we know it will end, and a new better world will come, is true. I say this because the world as we know it was built upon oil, and it would seem by 2012 there will no longer be a cheap source of oil. The world then would end as we know it, and the new better world would be in that as global warming now becomes a threat due to burning oil, in large part, we will no longer be able to burn oil and will have to switch over to clean renewable fuels. One might hazard to guess from the fact that we don't have enough oil to destroy the earth, and thereby ourselves, it is as if we are here for a reason (i.e. we are not able to destroy ourselves), though the latter could be debated.

Fiction-Reality Entanglement: Levinson, Asimov, And Clarke

2011-11-10T22:15:00.001-08:00

Open publication - Free publishing - More asimov

More of the Visionary, Wells

2011-10-23T14:57:00.001-07:00

More of Wells the visionary, his words 50 years ago or so apply to today more than ever. I put in brackets in the following quote how they apply:

“Our universe is not merely bankrupt [diminishing resources]; there remains no dividend at all [destruction of the environment]; It has not simply liquidated [overpopulation]; it is going clean out of existence [mismanagement of resources], leaving not a wrack behind [devastation of the Earth]. The attempt to trace a pattern of any sort is absolutely futile [formulate a viable plan].”

H.G. Wells, “Mind At The End Of Its Tether”

Are Humans Alone In The Universe And Are They Here For A Reason?

2011-10-23T13:32:00.001-07:00

Open publication - Free publishing - More astrobiology

continuation of the nine-fifths phenomenon

2011-10-15T16:01:00.000-07:00

There is more to the unification of phi and pi through the solar system. I considered the first three digits of each, after the decimal points. I look now at the next two after those in pi and they are 5 then 9, which are the 5 and nine of the nine-fifths that occurs in the solar system and the fourth digit after the decimal in phi is zero, the fifth is 3. I had written:

I have often spoken of nine-fifths (9/5) as pivotal to the solar system and nature. It is in the ratio of the orbit of saturn to that of jupiter in their closest approaches to the sun putting the earth at one unit from the sun. It is in the ratio of the solar radius to the moon's orbit around earth. It is in the molar mass of gold to the molar mass of silver. I have shown that the sequence 1.8n = a_n where each successive number is a whole number multiple of 1.8 which is nine-fifths, is a sequence that is pivotal to the structure of the solar system. Two of the most important numbers in mathematics are pi and the golden ratio (phi).

pi =3.141 and phi

phi = 1.618

I have just noticed if we add respective digits after the decimal in one number to the other, we get:

141 + 618 = 759

In 759 we have the nine of nine fifths and the five of nine-fifths, and the 7 is the average of 9 and five. That is:

(9+5)/2= 14/2 = 7

Dreams and Movies: The Space Odyssey Intro

2011-10-13T20:33:00.000-07:00

I calculated to see the earth as the same size as the moon one would have to be about one and a half million kilometers from the earth. An astronomical unit (AU) is the average earth-sun separation, which varies very little due to the earth’s nearly perfect circular orbit. Let’s convert our distance into astronomical units (1 AU = 1.5E8 km):

(1.5E6 km)/(1.5E8 km) = 0.01 AU

I also calculated that one would have to move away from the earth and towards the sun such that they were 1.48E8 km (148 million kilometers) from the sun to see the sun the same size as the earth. Let us covert that distance to AU:

(1.48E8 km)/(1.5E8 km) = 0.99 AU

Let us add the first result to the second result:

0.01 AU + 0.99 AU = one astronomical unit

That says you have to move from the earth a distance towards the sun that would reduce earth to the size of the moon to make the sun appear the same size as the earth.

It was a series of dreams that lead to me making these calculations, and it would turn out that there is a mystical significance to them. But is that perhaps not what Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke are saying in the intro to their movie 2001: A Space Odyssey when they use the following image:

Let me post the story that lead me to making these calculations:

Remote Imaging And Astronomy

I had one of those dreams some while ago, when, you know, you are sort of half awake and half asleep when you feel an image is being suddenly beamed to you from outer space. It was a planet that looked like the earth, but appeared to be the same size as the moon. So naturally, when I awoke, I calculated how far the earth would have to be from me to appear the same size as the moon. The answer turned out to be about one and a half million kilometers. That was on December twenty sixth, 2008. I date everything I do; it is part of my scientific training. I never gave the calculation much importance, so I published it in my journal separate from my scientific works. My scientific works that I have seen as most valuable have been arrived at through gut instinct and intuition.

But it was about a couple of weeks ago, maybe a week ago, that I was in that state of being half asleep and half awake where I felt that same feeling of another image being beamed to me from deep space. It was of a similar nature: this time it was the sun removed a distance from the earth that made it appear the same size as the earth does from the moon.

It occurs to me these images came to me when I was feeling the same way in both instances, worried about the fate of the earth.

It then dawned on me, though I cannot be telepathic, there could be those extraterrestrials who, being millions of years older than we are, could be telepathic, and could beam information to humans. So I am thinking now, that maybe this way of calculating might mean something important. I have decided to do the calculation, and work out what I can by connecting the calculation of Dec 26, 2008. Today is Oct 8, 2011. The calculation is quite easy for me to do now, because I merely need to access the formula I arrived at for the calculation of the earth and the moon.

Solar radius: 6.9599E10 cm
Earth radius: 6,378 km

(6,378 km)(1000 m/km) = 6.378E6 m
(6.378E6 m)(100 cm/m) = 6.378E8 cm

Moon radius: (3,476 km)/2 = 1.738E3 km

(1.738E3 km)(1000 m/km) = 1.738E6 m
(1.738E6 m)(100 cm/m) = 1.738E8 cm

Earth-moon distance: (384,000 km)(1000 m/km) = 3.84E08 m
(3.84E8 m)(100 cm/m) = 3.84 E 10 cm

(6.9599E10)/(6.378E08) = 1.09E2 = 109

That is the sun is 109 times larger than the earth.

(109)(3.84E8) = 4.1E10cm

No, wait, I have to multiply that answer by a hundred, obviously, to correct for an error:

4.1E12 cm

(4.1E12 cm)/(100 cm/m) = (4.1E8 m)/(1000m/km)=4.1E7km

= 41,000,000 km

The Sun, then, would have to be forty one million kilometers from the earth, to appear the same size as the earth does from the moon. Let me post here that which I wrote on Dec 26, 2008:

I consider myself a “stargazer”, which means I not only watch the heavens, but, contemplate them, when I can. Recently I dreamt of them, and awoke remembering exact names of planets and stars, and their natural aspects.

I saw a beautiful crystalline image of a planet through a telescope, with the silvery color of the moon, and its craters, but had mountains covered in snow. The first thing I said to myself was that this planet was abundant in resources and habitable, except for one thing, the nearest star to it was so far from it that it was a point, not a disc. The first thing I thought, and even asked, was can we make a star like the sun that is close to it, to warm it?

Of course there could have been no such a planet with snow so far from anything warm enough to keep the snow from turning to ice, but such is the nature of dreams. I knew the name of the star that it was nearest to, and I was asking if it was in a long period orbit about the star, or was it just its neighbor, moving with it in the galaxy. The name of the star was Betelegeuse, a star in the constellation Orion, the second and sometimes first, brightest star in that constellation.

I also knew the name of the planet in the dream. For some reason it was called Alcor. When I had awakened, I thought, Alcor is the name of a star.

Why was the planet near Betelgeuse, and why was I dreaming of a planet that had the same name as a star? My mind has always been preoccupied with space travel, more precisely how we might make the immense journey beyond the planets of our solar system to the stars and their planets. Was I dreaming of the sometimes brightest star in Orion, because the project, Project Orion, one of the first plans for a starship, was named after that constellation?
What about this planet, Alcor, having the same name as a star? Alcor is the fainter of a pair of stars, a visual binary, in the constellation Ursa Major, known as The Great Bear, or more commonly, The Big Dipper. The Pair is Alcor and Mizar, Mizar being an actual binary resolved only by a telescope, Alcor in reality is a good quarter of a light year from Mizar.

Alcor and Mizar are known as the horse and rider, Alcor being derived from the Arabic word “Al-jat”, meaning rider. Was I dreaming of “horse and rider” because they represent travel?

Furthermore, was I dreaming of the horse and rider, because they are members of a constellation which has as its core elements stars that are members of the nearest star cluster? What a better first interstellar mission for Orion than to the closest cluster? The cluster in Ursa Major is not only the closest, but is made of main sequence stars, stars that are stable and ideally hospitable for habitable planets.

I began analyzing my dream to see if in dreams we can see into the unknown. I may not have solved the problem of interstellar travel, but the dream has put it into perspective, for me.

I also saw this planet somehow knowing it was the size of the earth, but appearing as the size of the moon. I will end this with a question, for dream material. The question will be in how far from the earth must we be to see it as the same size as the moon. Here that number is presented and calculated:

(earth-diameter)/(moon-diameter) = (12,760 km)/(3,476 km)

= 3.67 = (earth-distance)/(moon-distance)

= (earth-distance)/(384,000 km)
(earth-distance) = (3.67)(384,000) = 1,409,280 kilometers

December 26 2008

Since Space Odyssey novels of Arthur C. Clarke and the movie by Clarke and Kubrick involve humans, which relate to Earth and the Sun, it seems one should calculate where one should be between the Sun and the Earth so that they both appear the same size. It is easy to do because we have calculated the how much larger the sun is than the earth. It is 109 times larger.

The Earth-Sun separation is one astronomical unit (A.U.) which is:

(1.495979E13 cm)/(100 cm)(1000 m) = 1.495979E8 km

(1/109)(1.495979E8 km) = 1.372E6 km

1.495979E8 km – 1.372E6 km =1.482259E8 km

That is, you have to be 1,372,000 kilometers from Earth and 148,225,900 kilometers from the Sun to see them both as the same size.

Quite simply one has to be 109 times further from the sun than from the earth to see it the same size as the earth.

Oct 8, 2011

H.G. Wells and Global Warming

2011-10-05T09:37:00.000-07:00

Such the visionary was H.G. Wells. His words some 60 years ago describe our world today so accurately. I put in brackets where I see his words to match with the problems of today, though really, in my opinion, the entire passage is extraordinarily accurate.

“The writer has already made the distinction between his very intermittent and specialized phases as a philosophical enquirer and the normal interests of his life. There he is just another ant, albeit sustained in his stoical acceptance by a rare and peculiar vision [Global Warming]. But the masses of our fellow-creatures have not that vision to sustain them, and we have to square our everyday conduct to theirs.

“There are large ambiguous masses of the formicary, whose leaders, unable to grasp what is happening [Global Warming] are resorting to the most evil and malignant magic propitiations to avert the distrustful fate that closes in upon us all [Catastrophic Climate Change]. Denunciation, which implements old prejudices with a new cruelty, flourishes. The unfortunate ant involved in these milling masses does his best to keep his faith to those whom he has given himself over. So he may get away with it to the end. He may feel uncomfortable and disconcerted at times, but he and his associates will for the most part sustain an atmosphere of valiant futility [Denying the Science of Climate Change], assuring themselves and one another that presently the old game will be resumed with all its present stresses gone like a dream. And even before he is sufficiently awake to tell his dream of his world restored, he will have forgotten it and passed into nothingness forever (Extinction of Humans on Earth].”

H.G. Wells
Mind at the End of Its Tether

An Assessment - By Ian Beardsley

2011-09-28T00:38:00.000-07:00

The Mystical Elements Of The Genesis Project

2011-09-25T03:09:00.001-07:00

Seeds

Seeing the movie "Pirates" I there saw a ship with the sea god Neptune, trident in hand, mounted to the front. Years later this image seemed to say it meant something pertaining to the Universe and the Planet Neptune. My astronomical research indeed, years later, ended at that planet, with my Neptune equation.

Finally, as I had not made any progress for a while, another image struck me. It was when I saw a book called "Plutonia" in the personal library of Paul Levinson, in a movie about his book, "Behind The Plot to Save Socrates". Its age, and reddish-pink cover reminded me of my book "The Levinson-Asimov-Clarke Phenomenon", as it is a funky cover designed by myself of a rocket traveling in a pink Universe. My Book itself is, in part, about Paul Levinson's "Plot To Save Socrates". And because Plutonia derives from Pluto, which is a planet, one I had yet to consider in the research for this project, it is about Plutonia.

My book, so far, ends in a phenomenon linking Levinson, Asimov, and Clarke, to the timewave theory of Terence McKenna, which was inspired by his taking hallucinogenic psilocybin mushrooms in a jungle in South America under Shamanistic instruction.

After researching the work Plutonia at wikipedia, I found Plutonia is not just a science fiction novel by a Russian Scientist, written in 1915, but is a type of hallucinogenic psilocybin mushroom called psilocybin plutonia (common name “magic mushrooms”).

Since timewave is about interconnectedness, and so is my book, I thought I would post this occurrence here.

Since interconnectedness arises in my research pertaining to Paul Levinson's "The Plot To Save Socrates", and his book is about time travel, I am beginning to understand why: interconnectedness has everything to do with time.

Ian Beardsley
April 17, 2011

“Plutonia” arrived in the mail April 20, 2011. I started reading it on that day. The book begins with a team of four scientists leaving Moscow for an Arctic expedition on April 20 (the same date). I am right in phase with their adventure. I also ordered The Silk Code by Paul Levinson on April 20, 2011, realizing after having received an e-mail from Amazon.com that it shipped out on April 20 that this book was in sync with “Plutonia”, I ordered The Silk Code because Paul Levinson’s “Plot To Save Socrates” was part of the “fiction-reality entanglement” I had been experiencing.

Archimedes Plutonium

Having finished the book “Plutonia” which lead me to consider the last planet “Pluto”, among other things already mentioned, I decided to post my work to the discussion group sci.astro, a google group. Something I had postponed for years, and thought maybe would not be a good idea at all do to the given the nature of this work. Immediately posted above my work was the work of an author whose pen name is Archimedes Plutonium. This immediately gave me another aspect of the word Pluto. In his theory, called The Atom Totality Theory, he shows that the element 231 Plutonium describes the myriad aspects of the Universe. Precisely, the numbers of electron shells, and subshells of that isotope of plutonium provide ratios that describe approximations to the value of pi, euler’s number e, the background radiation of the universe, the fine structure constant and an explanation for the imaginary number, i.

Furthermore, I found it interesting that the isotope of plutonium that does this is 231, because not only does my work bear a connection to the book “Plutonia”, it also bears a connection to 2001: A Space Odyssey and its sequels because the monolith in that book has proportions that are the squares of 1, 2, and 3 which I have explained relate to my discovery of 9/5 throughout nature and 1, 2, 3 are the digits in 231 Plutonium. Once again, the time that I do specific works and read other works, I find my life entangled with literature, no doubt from my trips to Mexico and Italy, whose literature is often based on this phenomenon that is a part of life in those countries. The thing is to find my way out of it, and approach academics from that methodology I practiced while a student at The University of Oregon and working at the state observatory. Perhaps then I can see my work in a new light, one where it is a part of me as opposed to me being a part of it.

Ian Beardsley May 16, 2011

Interconnectedness

There is a very attractive way to approaching the phenomenon that science fiction is interconnected with cosmic events. Interconnectedness occurs, in my experience, both in Italy and in Mexico.

When I was married to a woman from Italy, we used to watch an American soap opera called “The Bold and the Beautiful” when we were living in California. When my wife and I went to Italy, it turned out that the mother of my wife liked the soap opera too, and that it aired in Italy.

When my wife and I arrived in Italy, the show not only aired in Italy, but the entire cast for that show was in Italy, and it was being filmed there because it was part of the story in the soap opera that the one of the characters in the story got a job as a fashion model in Italy, which brought her and all of her friends to Italy.

But, it went further than that. When I was in Italy, my wife and I watched a movie that just came out, I don’t remember the name, but it was about a writer who had writer’s block, and his friend suggested that the two of them leave the city and go to a retreat out in nature to get a fresh view of life. However, the writer in the movie was going crazy at the retreat because there was no television, and he was having a hard time being away from watching the soap opera, “The Bold And The Beautiful”. When new tourists arrived at the retreat, he yelled out from his cabin to them, “What has become of so, and so, in the Bold and The Beautiful?”

Here we see fiction becoming intertwined with the life of my wife and I. But, such things first happened to me in Mexico.

I was going to school in Queretaro, Mexico about an hour north of Mexico City. When I was down in the plaza in Queretaro having lunch, two girls from Germany who were passing through the city, and in Mexico because there parents worked there, asked me where they could find a place to stay. I told them they could stay at the house where I was staying. They stayed a few days, and then returned to the city where they lived.

A few days later, some fellow students and my self went traveling in Mexico. We went to the town famous for nightlife, San Miguel de Allende. We got in a cab and asked the driver to take us to a youth hostel, and we drove around for hours only to find that every place was full. It was because there was a big celebration going on in the city. So, the cab driver dropped us off at one of the plazas and there we were thinking what we were going to do when I ran into the two German girls I had let stay at my place in Queretaro. I explained to them that we were looking for a place to stay but everything was full.

They said they had a place to stay and that we could stay there. We were told to go to their window at a particular Motel, they would throw us the keys to their room out the window, and we were to walk through the main office of the Hotel, show them the keys and act like we already rented a room there.

So, there is a certain kind of magic in Italy and Mexico that is very real, that verifies the theory of interconnectedness in the theory of timewave zero. Such a theme is common to South American Literature. Consider the novel “Aunt Julia and The Scriptwriter” by Mario Vargas Llosa. It is about a scriptwriter who is writing a weekly soap opera for a radio theater and it comes to the point she cannot distinguish her life from the soap she is writing and does not know after awhile which is real, the radio drama or her life.

Another fine example of interconnectedness is put forth in the book “The Castle of Crossed Destinies” by Italo Calvino, an Italian writer. In this story an old castle is an inn for travelers. After food and drink at the same table in the castle, one night, all of the travelers strangers to one another, begin a process where one person lays out a tarot card and tells a story about it that relates to his travels before he arrived at the in. He lays out cards forming lines that tell his story, then other travelers lay out cards telling there stories, but find they can use cards that other travelers already used and it turns out they have the same meaning sometimes. So, though these travelers never met, they encountered in their travels the same people or events at times, they find. The finished layout looks like a finished game of dominoes with points of intersection at many spots. It turns out that everyone shared experiences in common but had never met one another, hence the title of the book, “The Castle of “Crossed Destinies.”

• Papers in which I am listed as co-author (Beardsley I.S.)

• 1986 _Kemp J. C.; Henson G. D.; Kraus D. J.; Carroll L. C.; Beardsley I. S.; Takagishi K.; Jugaku J.; Matsuoka M.; Leibowitz E. M.; Mazeh T.; Mendelson H._SS 433: A 6 year photometric record_Astrophys. J. 305, 805 (1986)
• Department of Physics, University of Oregon

• 1986 _Kemp J. C.; Henson G. D.; Kraus D. J.; Beardsley I. S.; Carroll L. C.; Duncan D. K._Variable polarization and activity in Arcturus_Astrophys. J. Lett. 301, L35 (1986)
• Department of Physics, University of Oregon

• 1986 _Kemp J. C.; Henson G. D.; Kraus D. J.; Beardsley J. S.; Carroll L. C.; Ake T. B.; Simon T.; Collins G. W._Epsilon Aurigae: Polarization, light curves, and geometry of the 1982–1983 eclipse_Astrophys. J. Lett. 300, L11 (1986)
Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene

Genesis Projects 01, 02, And 03

2011-09-25T02:21:00.000-07:00

Open publication - Free publishing - More astronomy

Genesis Project 03

2011-09-21T16:34:00.000-07:00

Open publication - Free publishing - More astronomy

nine-fifths, pi, and the golden ratio

2011-09-20T15:26:00.000-07:00

Chapter One: The Unification Of Pi and Phi by Nine-Fifths

I have often spoken of nine-fifths (9/5) as pivotal to the solar system and nature. It is in the ratio of the orbit of saturn to that of jupiter in their closest approaches to the sun putting the earth at one unit from the sun. It is in the ratio of the solar radius to the moon's orbit around earth. It is in the molar mass of gold to the molar mass of silver. I have shown that the sequence 1.8n = a_n where each successive number is a whole number multiple of 1.8 which is nine-fifths, is a sequence that is pivotal to the structure of the solar system. Two of the most important numbers in mathematics are pi and the golden ratio (phi).

pi =3.141 and phi

phi = 1.618

I have just noticed if we add respective digits after the decimal in one number to the other, we get:

141 + 618 = 759

In 759 we have the nine of nine fifths and the five of nine-fifths, and the 7 is the average of 9 and five. That is:

(9+5)/2= 14/2 = 7

We determine the golden angle by multiplying 1.618 by 360 the degrees in a circle:

1.618(360) = 582.48

We subtract 360:

582.48-360 = 222.48

360-222.48 = 137.52 = the golden angle

The golden angle is angle leaves rotate around the stem of a plant as you go down it.

We determine the nine-fifths angle: 1.8(360) = 648 648-360 = 288 and 288-360=72

360/72 = 5

That means if leaves were to rotate around the stem of a plant by the nine-fifths angle, their position would repeat every five times. This frequency of five brings to mind a statement by the Russian scientist Shubnikov:
“As to the alive organisms, we have not for them such theory, which could answer the question what kinds of symmetry are compatible or incompatible to existence of living material. But we can note here that remarkable fact that among the representatives of the alive nature the pentagonal symmetry meets more often.”

The Nine-Fifths angle is then 72 degrees. This is the separation between petals in a most popular flower petal arrangement: that one in which we see five petals around the stem.

Pentagonal symmetry is five-fold. It would appear 9/5 (1.8) brings together pi the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter, and phi, the golden ratio, in a most stunning way.

Ian Beardsley September 21, 2011

The numbers after the decimal in a ratio are the most important because they are the fraction. In going around a circle, the numbers before the decimal, the whole numbers, no matter what they are take one to the beginning of the circle. We then look at the fraction in the sum of pi and phi, which is, to three places after the decimal, 4.759. That is we look at 0.759: it is close to 0.76 which is 19/25 (nineteen twenty fifths.

We multiply it by the degrees in a circle and find it is 273.6 degrees. The number 0.759 times the degrees in a circle are 273.24 degrees. We may want to consider as well that 0.759 is close to three quarters (3/4). We multiply that by the degrees in a cirlce: It is 270 degrees.

Perhaps I should repost just where I found 1.8n in the solar system:

My work in my book “The Levinson-Asimov-Clarke Phenomenon”, which is one of the books in my book “Psychohistory and Developing a Viable Plan for Humanity” has lead me to organizing my discoveries outlined in “Chapter 49: The Road From Ebla” (which is not the forty-ninth chapter of that book) in the following format, because it brings into light new relationships:

P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8,…=

Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune,…

(OP6/OP5), 10(RP1/RP3), 10(OP1/OP3), 10(OP2/OP3), (OP5/OP3), (MP6/MP8), 10(OP8/OP7) =

1.8, 3.6, 3.6, 7.2, 5.4, 5.4, 3.6,…

Where 10 = (mass of earth)/(mass of mars)

And O = orbit, R = Radius, M = Mass

And the numbers are generated in the sequence:

1.8, 3.6, 5.4, 7.2,… = a_n = 1.8n

The purpose of organizing the discovery like this has been a first step in modeling a solar system that would produce the solar system we live in.

Ian Beardsley
August 18, 2011

For a plot of this relationship, goto the post itself:

http://geoengineering-eanbardsley.blogspot.com/2011/08/structure-of-suns-solar-system.html

Ian Beardsley Oct 12, 2011

timewave zero and fiction-reality entanglement

2011-09-19T18:37:00.001-07:00

timewave zero and fiction-reality entanglement from Ian Beardsley on Vimeo.

The Jupiter of Clarke and My Neptune

2011-09-15T16:59:00.000-07:00

About The Saga

Gaia Hypothesis says the physical aspects of Earth interact with the biological aspects of Earth to maintain such a system that taken as a whole is Gaia. It further tells us humans are a part of Gaia and if humans have become bad for Gaia in some way, Gaia will eliminate humans to adjust the system for its own good. I believe, from my work in “The Exciting Neptune Saga”, that the planet Neptune holds a clue as to what humans need to do to counter their negative effects on Gaia.

The Exciting Neptune Saga by Ian Beardsley differs from The Space Odyssey series of Arthur C. Clarke in that it is not about the planet Jupiter and the birth of a new life bearing star system in our solar system. It is about the planet Neptune and how it holds the key to the success of humanity and the planet Earth.

Becoming a spacefaring civilization is, in my point of view, more a social and political problem than a technological one.

If the people were to get behind their governments with such aspirations, and the governments were to use resources wisely while managing things for the well being of the people, the technology would come of its own accord. It is already advancing at astonishing rates.

It is the purpose of this work to find reason to go into space that can be presented to society, to get them behind the goal of the settlement of the solar system, and even behind the goal of going to the stars, both of which would have immense returns.

This work also strives to find the secret behind life sustaining star systems so as to create, maintain, and rejuvenate them. Such an endeavor could be called a “project genesis”.

See my comment to the post in this blog, at:

http://geoengineering-eanbardsley.blogspot.com/2011/08/early-earth-atmosphere-and-its.html

concerning earth orbiting jupiter as a ghost.

genesis project 02

2011-09-14T15:56:00.000-07:00

Open publication - Free publishing - More astronomy

Young Frankenstein: Bestowing life on inanimate matter

2011-09-10T23:45:00.000-07:00

Ecosystems In Genesis Project

2011-09-10T22:39:00.000-07:00

Ecosystems

Bestowing life upon inanimate matter is one matter and is a matter for nuclear chemistry. The naturally occurring elements, such as aluminum, gold, tin, silver, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen are fundamental units defined by the number of subatomic particles that constitute them. They can be combined to make compounds, and the compounds can be taken apart in a chemical reaction by applying heat or mixing them, and once combined the compounds can be reduced to elements, but the reduction stops there; that is the realm of physical chemistry. If one wants to break elements down further, into subatomic particles, which would be protons, electrons and neutrons, or combine protons, electrons, and neutrons into elements such as gold or silver, that is a matter of nuclear chemistry and requires much greater energies.

Elements are atoms, and if one wanted to take apart the element silicon, he would have to split the atom into its parts, the protons, electrons and neutrons. This would be the process of fission. If one wanted to then take these subatomic particles and put them together into the element carbon, one would have to perform nuclear fusion, which is the process by which the sun makes energy, only fusing hydrogen into the heavier helium. It takes a great deal of energy for the sun to do this, which is provided by its gravity, which is strong enough to do this because the sun is so massive. We have yet been able to make a tabletop fusion reactor that could do this precisely because the energy required to do it is more than we can currently manage in the laboratory.

In a genesis project, taking apart silicon and reorganizing its parts into carbon would be necessary, because dead worlds are often made of silicon, and carbon is needed to make organic compounds. But let us turn our attention away from this aspect of a genesis project and turn our attention to the subject of ecosystems.

In order to understand ecosystems we have to understand the most sacred law of physics: conservation of energy. We have to understand that energy can neither be created nor destroyed and that it always goes from a form of usable to unusable. There is a set amount of energy in the universe and as it is used, less energy exists and it can never be replenished, unless energy can be supplied by a source from outside the system one is considering. In the case of the earth that outside source is the sun. It is the primary source that supplies all life with the energy it needs through the complex cycles that make up our ecosystems. Let us look at what energy is.

In physics there are two types of energies: potential and kinetic. Potential energy can be understood like this: If I move a mass m, say a stone, a height h against a gravitational attraction of g it will have a potential energy of the quantity mgh. If I let it fall from the height h, that potential energy will convert itself into kinetic energy, or energy of motion in other words. That energy of motion can be described by the quantity m, of velocity v, and is given by (1/2)mv^2. It would follow that as the stone falls its potential energy decreases because its height decreases, and its kinetic energy increases because it has been falling a longer amount of time. We would conclude, then, that the sum of the kinetic energy and the potential energy equals a constant quantity of energy. That is what is meant by energy is conserved: as kinetic energy is gained potential energy is lost such that the energy of the system is constant. We would write then that:

(mgy) + (1/2)mv^2 = C

Where y is the height at any given moment and C is a constant. In this case C is mgh the maximum amount of energy or the potential energy before the stone was dropped from a height h. We can the write:

(mgy) + (1/2)mv^2 = mgh

If the stone was dropped from a height where h is 10 meters, and we know earth gravity is 9.8 m/s^2, and the mass of the stone is 3 kilograms, then mgh = (3)(9.8)(10)= 294 Joules where joules is energy in the kilogram-meters-seconds system. We can then write:

(mgy) + (1/2)mv^2 = 294 Joules

If we take y to be zero, that is the potential energy has converted completely to kinetic energy, then the term mgy vanishes and we have:

(1/2)mv^2 = 294 Joules or v^2 = (2)(294 Joules)/(3 kilograms)= 196

Thus v = 14 meters per second. That is the velocity of a stone dropped from 10 meters when it hits the ground.
The energy that gave the stone this velocity when it hit the ground was determined by how high the person in question lifted the stone against gravity and how massive the stone was. Once it fell the energy was spent and could not be created again unless energy was supplied from outside the system to restore it to its initial height. The energy from outside the system is the energy a person spends in lifting it to a potential.

Ecosystems are like that. Ecosystems are communities of life interdependent on one another and their physical environment. Just like the falling stone they have a potential energy that is lost as they carry out their functional parts, and almost all of the energy from outside the ecological system that keeps it going comes from the Sun.

Light from the sun is energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation. We know this if we stand in the sun because we feel that it warms us: heat is another form of energy. But it is not energy that animals can use to move about, they require chemical energy, like carbohydrates, or sugars in other words. Light can be converted into chemical energy, just like the potential energy of a stone can be converted into kinetic energy. Light provides the energy for plants to break apart water molecules and carbon dioxide gas that is in the air, and recombine it into a carbohydrate like sugar. No energy is created just switched from the form of radiation to chemical energy, a form of energy that can be stored in the plant as starch and eaten by an animal like a rabbit and that he can use to go about his daily activities. The rabbit can use this energy to make proteins, what we call meat, and it can be eaten by humans to fuel their metabolism and make them active. The plants use the sugars they made, to fuel their metabolic needs as well, so ultimately all of our energy comes from the sun.

Plants in making carbohydrates, or sugars, using energy from the sun, make the oxygen as well that humans need to burn the sugars they eat. The humans, in the process of using the oxygen, exhale carbon dioxide gas that the plants need to carry out the process of making the sugars, and oxygen all animals, including humans, need. We see the sun powers everything. It even powers the evaporation of water, in renewing water in the water cycle, and plants need nitrogen fixing bacteria, single cellular organisms that live in the soil to fix nitrogen from the air so plants can carry out the processes that all of life needs. These are just a few of the elements that make ecosystems work, but we see the entire ecosystem needs to exist for life to exist.

Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan Project Genesis

2011-09-10T12:35:00.000-07:00

Genesis Project Is A Different Approach To Science

2011-09-08T21:54:00.000-07:00

Genesis Project is not science in the traditional sense. That is, it is not researching how to bit by bit construct a living world, but rather is the search for the secret hidden in nature that instantaneously, and spontaneously brings a world overflowing with life into existence. The reason being is that a living world is what sustains humans. See my book:

http://issuu.com/eanbardsley/docs/genesis_project_01

and in particular, the following post:

http://geoengineering-eanbardsley.blogspot.com/2011/09/genesis-project-in-three-parts.html

Ian Beardsley
September 8, 2011

Genesis Project in Three Parts

2011-09-05T17:17:00.000-07:00

The construction of a Genesis Project consists of three parts:

1. Since all life is constructed of the same four molecules – carbohydrates, lipids, proteins and nucleotides – we must bring about their organization through a process of hyper-evolution, induced evolution, or, in other words create the seed for an induced-hyper-artificial selection. I use the word “hyper” because these four molecules organized themselves through a process of natural selection over a period of billions of years. We want to plant a seed on a dead planet that triggers the organization of these molecules into the myriad varieties of life, so as to instantly create the ecosystems that make life possible.

2. In order to construct these molecules, we must make sure that the selected dead planet has the substances methane, ammonia, water vapor and hydrogen gas, for it has been shown that combined under energy, these molecules form amino acids which make up the protein molecules listed above in part one.

3. We find a planet that has a primarily silicon crust, like the earth has and if it does not already have water, we can use the method invented by Arthur C. Clarke in 3001: The Final Odyssey where a space cowboy hauls comets with his ship, and lets them loose to crash into a dead world making an impact crater that fills with water from the ice that made up that comet in part, or

4. We find the secret to generating a planet with mainly silicon crust, and water if not in orbit around a main sequence hydrogen-fusing-into-helium star like the sun of our own generation.

In the author’s point of view, everything is a Genesis Project from cooking in the kitchen to working in the garden, because it is creating the conditions that support life. The author further feels nothing is more important than creating worlds that support life, that have life, because life cannot exist without other forms of life on the same world, and the reason is if we can make planets abundant in the life that supports humans we don’t rely on searching for other such worlds that are at un-surmountable distances from us, currently, and more than likely like a needle in a hay-stack, and even then, otherwise occupied by other life.

Ian Beardsley
September 5, 2011

The Heart of Biology

2011-09-02T21:09:00.000-07:00

Peptides are amino acids bound by a so-called peptide bond. Polypeptides are chains of peptides. They make proteins. The sequence of the amino acids determine the function of a protein, and, the behavior of the amino acid is determined by the functional group attached to the hydrocarbon skeletal chain, or ring. The instructions for the sequence of amino acids in a polypeptide is given by DNA, which is a double helix with paired adenine and thymine and paired guanine and cytosine. There are three pairs per nucleotide and their sequence is called genes. A replica of DNA exists in every cell of an organism; the instructions for each type of cell are determined by which parts of the DNA are turned on and which parts are turned off.

Ian Beardsley
September 2, 2011

genesis project 01

2011-08-29T22:39:00.000-07:00

Beethoven: Writing What Comes To Mind

2011-08-28T21:34:00.000-07:00

Listening to Beethoven and writing what comes to mind:

I have won! I am triumphant! What a marvelous specimen is Man,..wait, bad fortune seems to be lurking around the corner.

I prepare myself in advance,…that wasn’t so bad. In fact, it was easy. I am fine. After all have we not endured many trials? Necessity is the mother of invention.

Enter the Goodwick Fairchild: Tired, but he maintains good spirits with some effort. He has been at the factory all day making candles. He has just walked in the door and lit a candle at his humble apartment. A cold draft coming up between the slats in its wood floor, water dripping through the roof and being caught by a tin bowl by his bed. He takes off his jacket and lets out a big sigh, then sits at an old wood table and eats a bowl of soup. Suddenly,…

A man skipping through the forest, sunbeams shining through the pines, he throws flower petals over his shoulder.

Alas! Nature is a sublime mystery!

Ian Beardsley
August 28, 2011

Organic Matter

2011-08-28T01:22:00.000-07:00

Organic Matter

To clarify a project genesis it is necessary to define organic matter since it is that thing which distinguishes life chemistry from physical chemistry.

Organic matter is any of a hydrocarbon skeletal chain combined with a functional group. The hydrocarbons can occur in chains, branches, or rings of carbon double or single bonded to other carbon atoms and single bonded to hydrogen atoms. The functional group can consist of any of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and sulfur atoms most of the time.

The Universality Of Genesis

2011-08-27T20:28:00.001-07:00

The Universality Of Genesis

It is the author’s belief that life as it is structured on earth makes the optimum use of the naturally occurring elements provided by the universe and as such would be the same as on earth throughout the universe, for the most part – if not completely – even though other models have been presented.

An example of this is that life on earth is carbon based, and carbon is the lightest, least complex element having four valence electrons, which allows it to form in long chains. Another example would be that methane, ammonia, water, and hydrogen gas combined under energy form amino acids, the building blocks of life, and all of these, except the hydrogen, are systems of triangles while being made of the lightest elements at the top of the periodic table of elements and systems of triangles are the most stable structures.

Such examples can be further related, for photosynthesis, and metabolic functions in the living cells of both plants and animals to the structure of ecosystems on earth that make life possible. That is, there is a good chance a project genesis for earth would apply throughout the universe, or, at least, throughout most of the universe.

Ian Beardsley
August 27, 2011

Water

2011-08-26T23:58:00.000-07:00

Water

In beginning to build a project genesis, the term borrowed from a Star Trek movie, where we try to find the secret to life enriched star systems, the Earth being the only planet we know of so far like this, we have to look at both the physical, and the biological, or organic in other words. The physical can be the temperature of the sun, the distance of the earth from the sun, the mass of the earth (which determines the strength of its gravity) and the biological can be the chemistry that makes life possible, as in the chemical composition of DNA, metabolism, homeostasis or the structure of the fundamental units of life, the cell. It can go beyond this to bacteria in the soil that fixes nitrogen for plants to use and how the physical interacts with life to support it, and how the various populations of organisms interact together to support one another. These latter concepts would be the study of ecosystems.

At the heart of a project genesis, is life, and the single most important substance to make life as we know it possible, is water (H2O). Therefore nothing can be more important to a project genesis than understanding what water does that makes life possible and how it does it.

Let us look at the first:

1. Water Is Solvent: It allows compounds to separate and therefore for reactions to occur. The cells that make up life are aqueous solutions as well as the ocean. That is to say they are full of dissolved compounds. The dissolved substances in the ocean are necessary for aquatic organisms to take up.
2. Water Is Cohesive And Adhesive: This allows vessels present in both animals (blood vessels, arteries, and veins) and plants (roots, trunks, stems) to transport dissolved materials.
3. Water Has A High Surface Tension: This allows small debris to rest on top of water without sinking, providing food for organisms that live near its surface.
4. Water Has A High Specific Heat: This allows the earth to absorb a lot of heat without heating up, regulating the climate for conditions favorable to life.
5. Water Is Less Dense When It Freezes: Normally when a substance is frozen it becomes denser, but when water freezes it expands, therefore water in its solid state floats on water in its liquid state. If ice did not float on water, but rather sank, all bodies of water on earth would turn to ice all the way through at freezing temperatures, making life on earth impossible.

Let us look at how water does it:

Water is a polar molecule that does hydrogen bonding. That is we speak of elements combining to make neutral molecules. But the water molecule (written H2O) has an excess positivity in each hydrogen atom, and an excess negativity in its oxygen atom, causing attractivity between water molecules themselves, and attractiveness to other ions.

The Author's Statement

2011-08-22T16:25:00.001-07:00

I was very optimistic about the human situation when I learned two scientists, an engineer and an atmospheric physicist had invented cloud seeding yachts, simple and cheap to build that they calculate can compensate for global warming, and I am further optimistic in that it seems very hard to argue against the validity of their theory. See my post in this blog:

http://geoengineering-eanbardsley.blogspot.com/2011/08/geoengineering-and-neptune.html

While on the other hand, James Lovelock, a Brilliant climate scientist says humans are not clever enough to solve their way out of this situation. He has to be taken seriously, as the father of Gaia Hypothesis and someone who has already saved humanity once: he discovered how humans were destroying the o-ozone layer, without which life cannot exist on earth with his work in chemicals we were using that lead to their ban.

The main argument Lovelock seems to have is that overpopulation on earth and other factors are putting more heat retaining CO2 into the atmosphere than naturally occurring photosynthesizers can sink.

But, it seems to me being an intelligence that has landed on the moon and has sent robotic rovers to mars, let alone having developed fast computers and decoded the human genome, it would be a simple matter to engineer more photosythesizers that can clean the earth air of CO2, or even better, develop mechanisms that can convert the CO2 into oxygen better than plants do. I mean CO2 is a simple compound consisting of nothing more than a carbon atom and two oxygen atoms. Given what we can do in chemical engineering and what we know about biology, it seems to me it won’t be long before we can convert it into oxygen and bury the carbon.

But, then, maybe I should not say this, and be calm, because surely the scientists are working on this and have every bit of confidence that they can do this. Perhaps that is why the government seems to be entirely inactive where global warming is concerned, because they perhaps understand this. I, however, even in the face of the possibilities of such technologies, feel we should use clean, renewable energy and curb carbon emissions, as well as protect ecosystems from destruction that make life on earth possible. That is why I for one am working on a “project genesis”. While I seem to be a far cry from a technology that could stop global warming, I am getting at constructing the foundation that makes the complex biosphere on earth possible. I feel the end result can be a comprehensive understanding of what I like to call creation (whether or not a sentient hand was at work). With the problem of global warming solved, we would still have the problems of over population and diminishing resources to solve. But, I, for one, see solutions to those problems as well.

Ian Beardsley August 22, 2011

Defining a Project Genesis

2011-08-21T22:18:00.001-07:00

In initiating a project genesis, finding the secret behind life bearing planets (which involves the star they orbit – in our case the sun) we assume there is a function in the design.

In our case, the design is the earth completes one revolution around the sun in a year (12 months). The function is that the earth is covered mostly with water (about three quarters of its surface) and this regulates the climate because water has a high specific heat which means it takes a lot of heat energy to raise its temperature (precisely one calorie to raise a gram of it one degree centigrade).

Therefore, to find the secret to what we shall call creation (whether or not a sentient being had a hand in it) we look for how function is embedded in design by calculating how much energy is needed to raise the temperature of water from its freezing temperature to its boiling temperature, then turn that into steam for all the water on the planet, then divide that into the energy emitted by the sun over one year. That is, the energy to vaporize a frozen hydrosphere of the earth.

Heat of fusion for ice: 80 cal/g

Heat of vaporization of water: 540 cal/g

Specific heat of water: 1cal/g deg C

We consider the hydrosphere of the earth, that is, the total water found on, under, and over the earth, which is about 1.4E18 Tonnes:

1 tonne = 1,000 kg

1 kg = 1000 g

Water in hydrosphere: (1.4E18t)(1,000kg)(1,000g)

= 1.4E24 g

Energy to melt a frozen hydrosphere:

(1.4E24g)(80 cal/g) = 1.12E26 cal

Energy to raise hydrosphere to boiling temperature:

(1.4E24g)(100-0) deg C x 1.00 cal/g deg C = 1.4E26 cal

Energy to vaporize the hydrosphere:

(1.4E24g)(540 cal/g) = 7.56E26 cal

We add all three results:

1.12E26 cal + 1.4E26 cal +7.56E26 cal =1.008E27 cal

Converting calories to Joules (1 cal = 4.184 J):

(1.008 cal)(4.184 J/cal) = 4.2E27 J

That is, it takes 4.2E27J of energy to melt a frozen earth hydrosphere, raise its temperature to boiling, then vaporize it (turn it into a gas).

To move on, there are:

(365 days)(24 hours)(60 min)(60 sec)=3.15E7 seconds in a year

The solar luminosity is: 3.826E26 J/s and

(3.826E26 J/s)(3.15E7 s) = 1.21E34 J/yr

The sun produces 1.21E34 J of energy per year.

We do as we set out to do:

(1.21E34 J)/(4.2E27 J) = 2.88E6

The sun produces, then, in a year, enough energy to vaporize a frozen earth hydrosphere nearly three million times. Obtaining this figure is our first step in finding function in design, which we hypothesize has the answer to the secret behind our richly life bearing planet, Earth.

Ian Beardsley

August 21, 2011

the early earth atmosphere and its connection to the planets

2011-08-19T23:55:00.000-07:00

Chapter 61: Study Takes Form

Leonard made the connection between two studies of his to make a third subject that brought a lot together. He was definitely onto something.

Study 1

An interesting family of substances is methane (CH_4), ammonia (NH_3) and water vapor (H_2O). Methane is tetrahedral in structure, a carbon atom surrounded by 4 hydrogens. Ammonia is trigonal pyramidal, a nitrogen atom surrounded by 3 hydrogen atoms, and water vapor is triangular, or bent, an oxygen atom surrounded by two hydrogens. These represent stable structural systems as they are all systems of triangles, which are the only stable polygons. These substances combined under energy with hydrogen gas form amino acids, the building blocks of life. The core atoms of these molecules, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen, are all in period two of the periodic table and follow directly one after the other, and are all in amino acids, the hydrogen as well. It is a hypothesis of astrobiology that amino acids formed in the protoplanetary cloud before the earth ever formed. In this sense we may have our origins in deep space. Is what I mean by structural systems is that there are only three structural systems, the tetrahedron, the octahedron, and the icosohedron. They are the only stable solids, that is non-collapsing flex corners whose faces are triangles. Most compounds are something other than these, like pentagons with linear off shoots for example, that comprise the wrong number of atoms to make a "solid" unit, and I mean solid as in the pythagorean solids, the geometric term. Both methane and ammonia make different variations on the tetrahedron, a pythagorean solid. When plants perform photosynthesis, they combine carbon dioxide with water and release oxygen. The reaction is:

CO_2+2H_2O--àCH_2O+O_2+H_2O

As can be seen a sugar is made. Important to most plants to do this is Nitrogen. Nitrogen (N_2) is the most abundant gas in the earth atmosphere, comprising about 78.03% of it. We now calculate the molecular masses of these special gases:

CH_4=(12.01+4(1.01))=16.05

NH_3=(14.01+3(1.01))=17.04

CO_2=(12.01+2(16.00))=44.01

H_2O=(2(1.01)+16.00)=18.02

N_2=(14.01+14.01)=28.02

O_2=(16.00+16.00)=32.00

We now form some ratios between these molecular masses:

(O_2)/(CH_4)=32.00/16.05=1.992~2

(NH_3)/(CH_4)=17.04/16.06=1.061~1

(CO_2)/(O_2)=44.01/32.00~1.4=sqrt(2)

(CO_2)/(N_2)=44.01/28.02~1.6=(sqrt(5)+1)/2=phi

(O_2)/(H_2O)=32.00/18.02=1.776~sqrt(3)

Notice that these values are given by the sequence:

|2cos(pi/n)| n=(1,2,3,4,5,6)(pi/n)radians

Observe:

2=|2cos(pi)|

0=|2cos(pi/2)|

1=|2cos(pi/3)|

sqrt(2)=|2cos(pi/4)|

(sqrt(5)+1)/2=phi=|2cos(pi/5)|

sqrt(3)=|2cos(pi/6)|

Geometrically sqrt(2) is the ratio of the side of a square to its radius. Phi is the ratio of the chord of a regular pentagon to its side. Sqrt(3) is the ratio of the side of an equilateral triangle to its radius, and 1 is the ratio of the side of a regular hexagon to its radius. The square, the regular hexagon and the equilateral triangle are the tessellating regular polygons.

Study 2

Jupiter: failed star: vector associated with it

x-5 = 0 (fifth planet)

(x^2) – x - 1 = 0 (x in this equation is the golden ratio)

These two equations yield:

(x^2) – 2x + 4 = 0

This gives x = (1+3i) and (1-3i) where (i) is the square root of negative one.

In the complex plane these are the vectors <1, 3> and <1, -3>

Again we see Jupiter pointing to the earth (3 in the (i) axis, earth the third planet)

Venus: failed earth: vector associated with it

x-2=0 (second planet)

(x^2) – x – 1 = 0 (x in this equation is the golden ratio)

These two equations yield:

(x^2) – 2x + 1 = 0

(x – 1)(x – 1) = 0

This gives x = 1

In the complex plane this is the vector <1, 0>.

Note: Venus is represented by the regular hexagon because its side divided by its radius is one.

Mars: promises to be new earth: vector associated with it

x-4=0 (fourth planet)

(x^2) – x – 1 (x in this equation is the golden ratio)

These two equations yield:

(x^2) –2x + 3 = 0

This gives x = 1 + sqrt(2)i and x = 1 – sqrt(2)i

In the complex plane these are the vectors <1, sqrt(2)> and <1, -sqrt(2)>

Note: Mars is represented by the square because its side divided by its radius is the square root of two.

Earth: successful life bearing world: vector associated with it

x-3=0 (third planet)

(x^2) – x – 1 = 0 (x in this equation is the golden ratio)

These two equations yield:

(x^2) – 2x +2 = 0

This gives x = (1 + i) and x = (1 – i) where (i) is the square root of negative one.

In the complex plane these are the vectors <1, 1> and <1, -1>

Note: The vectors <1, 1> and <1, -1> have the angle of 45 degrees and negative 45 degrees associated with them. Such angles are the angles made between the sides of a square and its diagonal. The components of such vectors are sides of a unit square. It is appropriate, somehow, that earth is represented by the unit vectors because it is a successful life bearing planet, perhaps the only one, or the most so by far, in the solar system. Here we see mars and earth are again coupled as they have their representation in the same form, the square, in different ways.

We combine Study 1 with Study 2 and find Venus, Earth, and Mars have associated with them ratios of compounds such that the following table results.

Venus: failed Earth: Vector magnitude 1

Associated Compounds: (NH_3)/(CH_4)

Are prominent compounds in the early earth atmosphere.

Earth: Successful life bearing world: Vector magnitude sqrt(2)

Associated Compounds: (CO_2)/(O_2)

CO_2 prominent in early earth atmosphere

O_2 prominent in contemporary earth atmosphere

Mars: Promises to be New Earth: Vector magnitude sqrt(3)

Associated Compounds: (O_2)/(H_2O)

These compounds pivotal to life on Earth.

All of these compounds combined with hydrogen gas under energy form amino acids, the building blocks of life.

I have found more reason that the planet Mars represents the success of humankind in this passage:

Gentelmen, further, Mars is New Earth. I have done this:

We know that 9/5 occurs in many mysterious ways in nature, including Saturn’s distance from the sun of 9 (closest approach) putting Jupiter’s at five (closest approach), and the earth at one. Let us consider a balance. If two weights of equal mass are placed on opposite ends of a balance, then to be balanced the fulcrum must be placed at the center. But if one mass is increased, then the fulcrum will have to be moved closer to the heavier end if the balance is not to tip. This is the Law of Levers. It states that the masses are inversely proportion to their distances from the fulcrum. To write it mathematically,

M1/M2=L2/L1

Or, equivalently

(M1)(L1)=(M2)(L2)

If we consider the time when Saturn and Jupiter, the two most massive bodies in the solar system are in opposition, that is when they are on opposite sides of the sun and facing one another, then by the above information they are separated by 14 units. Jupiter is 3.34 times as massive as Saturn. By our law of levers above, that means

L1/L2=3.34

L1+L2=14

Thus

4.34L2=14 and

L2=3.2258

14-3.22=10.77=L1

Mars orbital distance is 1.5

The saturn-fulcrum distance minus the mars orbital distance is: 10.77-1.5=9.2~9 is saturn’s closest approach to the sun.

Mars, then, is the cosmic fulcrum. It is the one planet worth terraforming for colonization. It is then aligned metaphysically with its physical characteristics.

I also believe the following passage from “Searching For A Vision Of Humankind” may have much to do with all of this, as it involves Venus, Mars, and Earth.

It is worth noting:

Chapter 31: The Document

A look inside the journal of Leonard

August 9, 2010 Entry: Topic: Pivotal Point Of The Solar System

(M_j)(L_j)=(M_s)(L_s)

Saturn orbit = 9

Jupiter orbit = 5

9-5=4

L_j + L_s = 4

318L_j = 95L_s

95/318 = (L_j)/(L_s)

L_s = (4-L_J)

95/318 = (L_j)/(4-L_j)

(95)(4-L_j) = (318)(L_j)

380 – 95L_j = 318L_j

380 = 413L_j

L_j = (380)/(413) = 0.92

5 = 0.92 = 5.92 ~ 6

Thereby The Cosmic Fulcrum between Jupiter and Saturn in another arrangement is six astronomical units from the sun, or about one astronomical unit from Jupiter. The Earth is about one astronomical unit from the sun.
Summary

We have Earth straddled between Venus and Mars, between a failed Earth and a planet that promises to be New Earth in relationship pointing to Neptune where the success of Earth is concerned, Neptune being the eighth, or last planet in the Solar System.

We have Mars as the cosmic fulcrum for Jupiter and Saturn in one arrangement and Earth orbit around Jupiter a cosmic fulcrum with Jupiter and Saturn in the other arrangement. We can say the Earth orbits Jupiter as a ghost, and the sun for real.

We have compounds associated above with Mars that are essential to life as we know it, O2 and H2O.

We have compounds associated with Venus above that were prominent in the primordial earth atmosphere, NH3 and CH4.

We have compounds associated with earth that are the CO2 that was converted into O2 by plants making possible the oxygen breathing organisms, and the O2.

The Mathematical relationships above outline a story, a story I have told in “The Exciting Neptune Saga”, that has yet to realize on our part.

Structure of The Sun's Solar System

2011-08-18T19:13:00.000-07:00

My work in my book “The Levinson-Asimov-Clarke Phenomenon”, which is one of the books in my book “Psychohistory and Developing a Viable Plan for Humanity” has lead me to organizing my discoveries outlined in “Chapter 49: The Road From Ebla” (which is not the forty-ninth chapter of that book) in the following format, because it brings into light new relationships:

P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8,…=

Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune,…

(OP6/OP5), 10(RP1/RP3), 10(OP1/OP3), 10(OP2/OP3), (OP5/OP3), (MP6/MP8), (OP8/OP7) =

1.8, 3.6, 3.6, 7.2, 5.4, 5.4, 1.8,…

Where 10 = (mass of earth)/(mass of mars)

And O = orbit, R = Radius, M = Mass

And the numbers are generated in the sequence:

1.8, 3.6, 5.4, 7.2,… = a_n = 1.8n

The purpose of organizing the discovery like this has been a first step in modeling a solar system that would produce the solar system we live in.

Ian Beardsley

August 18, 2011

geoengineering and neptune

2011-08-18T10:30:00.001-07:00

I had published in my book The Levinson-Asimov-Clarke Phenomenon in Psychohistory And Developing A Viable Plan For Humanity that the planet Neptune may hold a clue to the success of the Earth and humanity in my neptune equation which can be read at:

http://issuu.com/eanbardsley/docs/three_books_and_cover

I just found a paper by an astronomer that shows that the planet Neptune is getting brighter and that since the earth is warming at the same time, it may be that a warming sun is the culprit. I won't say that burning fossil fuels is not the culprit, but I find it interesting in that it is the first indication that Neptune may be an indicator planet for the health of the Earth as I have interpreted my neptune equation indicates that it might be that. The paper can be read at:

http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007/2006GL028764.shtml

global warming and neptune

We have an equation that suggests the planet Neptune may hold a clue to the success of the Earth, in "The Exciting Neptune Saga". While Neptune is a gas giant it is often referred to as an ice giant because it has water, ammonia, and methane ice crystals in its atmosphere. Is that how Neptune indicates it could help the Earth? Does that mean we are supposed to sow the Earth atmosphere with water, ammonia, and methane ice crystals in that they might cause the excess heat retaining carbon dioxide gas in the atmosphere to condense such that it would fall to the ground as a solid or liquid, at least the carbon in the carbon dioxide gas so as to prevent global warming? This would be related to the science of cloud seeding. The British are developing wind powered cloud seeding yachts that can combat global warming. See the following video about this:

To see the origin of the neptune equation, visit the following blog post:

http://eanbardsley.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/ian-beardsley/

or read it at the end of this post.

The Cause of the Neptune Equation

The Cause of the sequences in my work The Exciting Neptune Saga that give birth to The Neptune Equation are more than likely due to orbital resonances that were in the protoplanetary clould disc that gave rise to the Solar System.

I am currently pursuing a derivation in the origin of these sequences that give rise to the neptune equation in the study of the science of the evolution of the protoplanetary cloud and the formation of the earth and the planets.

What reason is there to hypothesize that Neptune could have something to do with the earth. Gaia hypothesis by James Lovelock hypothesizes that the earth is like an organism where its various aspects change to adjust to changes so as to maintain its health.

As far as Gaia Hypothesis goes, I really think it may be a good idea to look at the solar system and beyond (stars and galaxies) to understand the Earth as the Gaia presented in Gaia Hypothesis.

Here is the origin of the neptune equation (from The Exciting Neptune Saga):

Where Mythology Meets Science: An ill reputed manuscript by Ian Beardsley

Chapter 49: The Road From Ebla

Leonard followed the story of the 33 Chilean miners who were trapped 2000 feet below the earth in a dark cavern for over two months after their mine exit had collapsed. These miners remained courageous, brave, and held onto their humanity throughout the whole ordeal. To Leonard, these men showed what the human spirit was capable of.

The government of Chile responded to the emergency with great organization and did a great job. The coping techniques and space food to the miners was provided by the United States Space Agency, NASA. It was a marvel of engineering the capsule NASA engineered that brought the miners to the surface. He admired NASA greatly, because of this, because they represented such a positive force in the world, as was demonstrated in the rescue of the miners. There were 33 miners trapped down there, and 33 years of age was the age they say Jesus died and was resurrected. NASA and the spirit and strength of the miners were like a salvation.

Yet, the president of the United States had recently shut down NASA as the agency that would send man into space, and had decided to contract the building of spacecraft to private industry. Leonard thought this was a mistake. NASA, and the ESA (European Space Agency) were the most positive forces in his life.

Since Leonard had begun working on his project several years back, he always felt the planet Neptune held the answer to the salvation of the Earth because of its vivacious, lively, incandescent blue. During the ordeal of the miners, he was thinking about the equation he had developed that he thought was most important, and finally he saw how it showed he was correct. That Neptune held the key to the survival of Humanity. Just as the last (33rd) miner was being pulled out from the collapsed mine and to the surface of the Earth, he had finished writing what he had discovered. He wrote in his Journal as follows:

We have an equation for a sequence that shows the Earth straddled between Venus and Mars. Venus is a failed Earth. Mars promises to be New Earth. The equation, that I presented in my work, “The Document”, is:

[(Venus-orbit)/(Earth-orbit)][(Earth-mass)/(Mars-mass)]n – (Mars orbital #) = a_n

The Mars orbital number is 4. If we want to know what planet in the solar system holds the key to the success of Earth, or to the success of humans, we let n =3 since the Earth is the third planet out from the Sun, in the equation and the result is a_n = 17.6. This means the planet that holds the key is Neptune. It has a mass of 17.23 earth masses, a number very close to our 17.6. The next step is to analyze Neptune, its composition and other factors.
He thought he must have been blind. Not only was Neptune the indicated planet, he found it had nearly the same surface gravity of earth. Though it was much more massive than earth, it was much larger and therefore less dense. That was why it came out to have the same surface gravity.

Neptune belongs to what one could categorize as a family of planets. The categorization is done by noticing four planets including Neptune have a similar inclination to their orbit. These Four planets are Neptune, Saturn, Earth, and Mars. Earth is the planet where humans originated, Mars promises to be New Earth. It is appropriate that Neptune is in this family of planets because we must set sail upon the cosmic ocean for Mars from Earth, to survive as a species, and Neptune is the Sea God in Roman mythology, which corresponds to Poseidon in Greek mythology. Neptune carried a trident. Kurt Beardsley has told the tale of the Tuareg people, a tribe of the Algerian desert who bears the trident as their symbol from a time before oceans receded there leaving behind desert. It is believed, as he has said, there is an ancient lost library in the mountains they take to, second only to that of Alexandria and holding ancient undiscovered manuscripts.

Where does the Neptune equation come from? The following Sequences:

Chapter 24: The Document

Salvoretti had done it. The structure of the solar system and dynamic elements of the Universe and Nature in general were tied up in the two sequences:

5, 14, 23, 32,…

and

1.8, 3.6, 5.4, 7.2,…

Could he find the connection between the two to localize the pivotal point of the solar system? Yes he could, he took their difference, subtracting respective terms in the second sequence from those in the first sequence to obtain the new sequence:

3.2, 10.4, 17.6, 24.8,…

Which is an arithmetic sequence with common difference of 7.2 meaning it is written

7.2n – 4 = a_n

The a_n is the nth term of the sequence, n is the number of the term in the sequence.

This he noticed could be written:

[(Venus-orbit)/(Earth-orbit)][(Earth-mass)/(Mars-mass)]n – (Mars orbital #) = a_n

Here is where some of the sequences come from:

The Search For The Tarot: Chapter 16

Salvoretti began writing in his journal:

We originally thought that 1.8 (9/5) occurred in the solar system and nature, alone. It is the ratio of Saturn orbit to Jupiter orbit in their closest approaches to the sun. It is the ratio of the solar radius to the lunar orbit. It is ratio of the molar mass of gold to that of silver. Then I discovered that approximately twice that value (3.7) was recurrent throughout the solar system and nature. Twice 1.8 is 3.6. I found it occurred in Jupiter, Saturn, Earth, Mercury, and Venus to name a few as 3.7. Now I have found it in Neptune and Uranus.

It occurs here to me we are not just dealing with 1.8 and 3.7, but any whole number multiple of 1.8. We are dealing with: a_n=1.8n

Let us try three times 1.8. It is 5.4. Immediately we see it in the most obvious, Jupiter. It is the largest and most massive planet in the solar system. Its furthest distance from the sun in its orbit is 5.455 AU ~ 5.4.

We see it in the following

(saturn mass)/(neptune mass)=(95.147)/(17.23)=5.522~5.4

I have already noted that Saturn and Neptune have similar inclinations to their orbit that are only common to Earth and Mars.

Thus we are dealing here with the sequence:

1.8, 3.6, 5.4, 7.2,…

Furthermore;

[(venus orbit)/(earth orbit)][(earth mass)/(mars mass)] = 7.2

Some of the most interesting occurrences of 3.7 in nature are:

[(volume of saturn)/(volume of Jupiter)](volume of mars)

=(mercury radius)(earth radius)^2

=[(venus orbit/earth orbit)(earth radius)]^3

=[(mercury orbit)/(earth orbit)](earth radius)^3

=0.37 cubic earth radii

0.37 can be converted to 3.7 by multiplying it by the ratio of earth mass to mars mass because it is close to ten.

(earth radius)/(moon radius)=

4(degrees in a circle)(moon distance)/(sun distance)

= 3.7

There are about as many days in a year as degrees in a circle

And to bring in the archaeology, since this is cosmic archaeology, my brother, Kurt Beardsley, may have a clue as to where some of the answers can be found in The Exciting Neptune Saga in the following interview I did with him (Bear in mind the sea god Neptune carried a trident):

Since ammonia ice crystals crystalize at -33 degrees centigrade, perhaps we are merely looking at the reaction of ammonia with carbon dioxide, though it may be that spraying the atmosphere with the cool ammonia ice crystals is that which is desired, for however long they remain ice crystals. Thus, we must consider the reaction between ammonia (NH3) and carbon dioxide (CO2):

Urea is made from ammonia and carbon dioxide:

2NH3 + CO2 --> NH2COONH4 (ammonium carbamate)
NH2COONH4 --> H2O + NH2CONH2 (urea),...

Ammonium carbonate is a form of salt used as a nitrogen fertilizer.

It may be we are supposed to use ammonium carbamate to attract water droplets in the atmosphere to form highly reflective clouds that would reflect large amounts of sunlight back into space.

I am still not sure exactly why the planet neptune may hold the answer to the success of the earth, so this idea of water, methane and ammonia ice crystals injected into the atmosphere is just speculation.

It may be that they would cool the atmosphere, but for any permanent solution, it would seem to me we have to find a way of getting have to get large amounts of heat retaining carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. Whatever the method, I feel we have to look at the planet Neptune for ideas of of doing this. This would fall under the discipline of geoengineering.

The Levinson-Asimov-Clarke Phenomenon and Fred Hoyle

I seem to have found evidence in support of the belief of that great English Astronomer, Fred Hoyle. He seems to have believed that humans are part of a plan, part of a process, common to life throughout the Universe. He further believed that it was clear by looking at the Earth.

He likened humanity to going down a raging river, having no idea what we will encounter, we have no idea what to do, our destiny is out of our hands, but by virtue of the plan we had oil, a most useful form of energy that gave us control over our situation and allowed us to develop to some level of sophistication. He wrote:

“How much coal and oil can you expect to find on a planet, not just the Earth, but on any one of the multitude of planets?…Not, I think, enormously more than on the Earth. Perhaps ten times more in favorable cases, but any planet too heavily loaded with such materials would tend to be unstable. It follows that intelligent creatures, evolving on any planet, will run into the same problems of fuel exhaustion – exhaustion of coal and oil – that we shall encounter in the next century our two.”

He continues:

“We already know what will have to be done about that: we must change our energy source to nuclear reactions, uranium, thorium, or perhaps fusion of deuterium.”

And here is where he suggests we are part of a plan:

“It has been a very long step from the first crude charcoal smelting to a nuclear reactor. We ourselves have managed this step in about six or seven thousand years. A major fraction of the way has indeed been achieved in two or three centuries. Could we have made our discoveries at a more leisurely pace than this? No, we could not. The pace of discovery had to be very fast, otherwise all the coal and oil would have been gone before the advent of nuclear physics.”

He then points out if we fail, no other species can take over and succeed because there are only enough resources for one try: “This is a one shot affair. If we fail, this planetary system fails so far as intelligence is concerned.”

I wrote in a fictional story the following passage that reveals humans as part of a plan, but not as revealed by oil on earth, but rather by the structure of the solar system, and chemical elements:

The Coupling of Mars and Earth
Salvoretti and Tara are discussing things as they drive back to Turin.
Salvoretti: “Tara, I can’t get over what you said earlier that two of the Pythagorean Solids have volumes, one of nine tetrahedra and the other of five tetrahedra. There are only five Pythagorean solids and two of them have volumes the same numbers as the distance to Jupiter and Saturn in their closest approaches to the sun if the earth is at one unit from the sun! This means the tetrahedron represents the earth because it has a volume of one. This is interesting because the solar radius to the earth-moon distance is 9 to 5, and 9 to 5 is the molar mass of gold to the molar mass of silver.”
“Why is this so incredible? It is incredible because the tetrahedron also has four faces and Mars is the fourth planet. It is appropriate that the tetrahedron couples earth and mars, further, in that it is four faced (mars is the fourth planet from the sun), and each face has three vertices (earth is the third planet from the sun). You may not think that is incredible but consider categorizing the planets with the smallest abundant number, twelve. Smallest abundant number means it is the most divisible for its size. Twelve is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 a whole number of times. The sum of these numbers is 16, which is greater than 12. Mars is the fourth planet out from the sun. Twelve divided by four is three, and the earth is the third planet out from the sun. Thus once again the earth and Mars are coupled.”
“I can couple them again. Elements are atoms, and the numbers of particles that constitute them determine the element, and its relative mass, or “molar mass” as it is called. The atmosphere of Mars is mostly CO2, about 95 percent. The earth atmosphere is more than 90 percent oxygen and nitrogen. I calculate CO2 to have a molar mass of 44.01 and earth air to have a molar mass of 28.5756. The Mars orbital distance compared to the earth orbital distance is about 1.5. The molar mass of CO2 compared to the molar mass of air is about 1.5. That is the mars-sun distance is to the earth-sun distance as Martian air is to earth air.”
“It goes further than that. If the earth surface gravity is 1, that of Mars is 0.380. That is a ratio of 2.63. The molar mass of oxygen gas (O2) what we breath, is 32.00. The molar mass of carbon, the basis of life as we know it, is 12.01. That is a ratio of 2.66. That says it takes about the same energy to lift a mole of carbon on earth, as it does to lift a mole of oxygen (O2) on mars the same distance.”
“Earth and Mars are yet further coupled:”
“The earth atmosphere was once mostly carbon dioxide (CO2) like the mars atmosphere is today, until plant life came along and started converting the carbon dioxide into oxygen, using light from the sun and in the process making the most fundamental sugar, glucose (which is at the bottom of the food chain). A process called photosynthesis.”
“Glucose is C6H12O6. I calculate glucose has a molar mass of 180.16 and water, which covers most of the surface of the earth, chemical formula H2O, I calculate has a molar mass of 18.016.”
“180.16 divided by 18.016 is about 10 and the earth is about 10 times as massive as mars. That is, glucose is to water as the earth mass is to the mass of mars.”
“You are probably wondering why I am so amazed that Mars and earth are so coupled empirically. Well the planet Mercury is too hot to support human life because it is so close to the sun, Venus has the same problem. But the earth is the next planet out and the right distance from the sun to be not too warm to support life._The next planet after the earth is Mars, and it may be cold, but not too cold to colonize, or even one day terraform (make habitable for humans). The next planet after Mars is Jupiter, not just too cold, but mostly gas, so there is nothing solid to stand on. The next planet, Saturn, even colder and mostly gaseous as well. The trend continues on to Neptune and Uranus. Pluto is just this cold little dwarf planet, whose thin atmosphere collapses when it is further from the sun.”
“You see then why I am so amazed Mars and earth are coupled by these numbers, they actually have one thing in common, solid planets, not climatically too hot for humans, or too cold.”
“These numbers that couple Mars with earth, seem to say the planet is there as a stepping stone to the stars, that it is time to wade out into the cosmic ocean, to use the metaphor of Carl Sagan, or sink. That is, for some reason we have what we need, but a challenge has been put to us. We have to overcome our problems, like spending money and resources on war instead of space exploration. Space exploration can solve the economic crisis. Colonizing Mars would generate a massive industry that would create work here on earth in every sector, for everyone, and, it would all be paid for by the resources that are out there in the solar system. As Cabal says to Passworthy in Things to come by H.G. Wells:”
““And if we’re no more than animals, we must snatch each little scrap of happiness, and live, and suffer, and pass, mattering no more than all the other animals do or have done. It is this, or that. All the universe or nothing. Which shall it be Passworthy? Which shall it be?””
“I believe we are at that time in history, and the NanoFET marks it. Brian Gilchrist is working on the NanoFET idea. Field Effect Transistors are used to charge light nanoparticles, so they can be ejected out the back end of a ship with a series of magnetic fields made by stacks of microchip components, much the same way charged particles are accelerated by electromagnets in a particle accelerator. The nanoFET ship can reach 90% the speed of light, theoretically, if built light and outside the earth’s gravity. Of course the ship is a starship that would take more than four years to reach the nearest star, but used to go to mars might only take a couple hours or so.”

Fred Hoyle goes on to say:

“Here I have argued that the most remarkable phase in the history of our species, that in which we are now living, the upsurge from a primitive Stone Age to a sophisticated culture and technology, is not just a chance affair. Things must go this way. We are following an inevitable path, one that must have been followed by many, many times on the other planets.”

He continues:

“If in other places other species have already followed the difficult route ahead of us, then plainly it would be an enormous advantage to know exactly where the dangers lie. My suspicion is that ample information exists in what I call a “galactic library” to show exactly what is going to happen to us if the world persists in following current policies.”

I feel I am tapping into a galactic library, but not being written by extraterrestrials, but rather written in nature and as well embedded in the works of certain science fiction writers, when I write:

I can say this. There are two possibilities:

We are either validating the time wave theory of Terrence McKenna which
says either:

1) time ends in 2012 (wouldn't be fun)
2) a new reality begins in 2012
3) we invent time travel in 2012 so that is why the McKenna timewave does not work past 2012.

Or we are constructing a new timewave based on the science fiction of Levinson, Asimov and Clarke because their trajectory can be substantiated by a structure we are finding in the universe, and the upside is it has no end, but rather suggests we will have hyperdrive by 2042 to 2044 and with that it secures the future of humankind into eternity.
And in nature when I write:

But let us ask again, which of the above two alternatives will be the case. I have found in other research that I have done, an equation that shows earth positioned between success and failure, an equation we can call “The Neptune Equation”. It indicates that the planet Neptune may hold the key to whether the earth is successful, or fails. The equation and how I arrived at it can be found in the following passage,

To read my full manuscript, visit the following link:

http://issuu.com/eanbardsley/docs/three_books_and_cover