I had published in my book The Levinson-Asimov-Clarke Phenomenon in Psychohistory And Developing A Viable Plan For Humanity that the planet Neptune may hold a clue to the success of the Earth and humanity in my neptune equation which can be read at:
http://issuu.com/eanbardsley/docs/three_books_and_cover
I just found a paper by an astronomer that shows that the planet Neptune is getting brighter and that since the earth is warming at the same time, it may be that a warming sun is the culprit. I won't say that burning fossil fuels is not the culprit, but I find it interesting in that it is the first indication that Neptune may be an indicator planet for the health of the Earth as I have interpreted my neptune equation indicates that it might be that. The paper can be read at:
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007/2006GL028764.shtml
global warming and neptune
We have an equation that suggests the planet Neptune may hold a clue to the success of the Earth, in "The Exciting Neptune Saga". While Neptune is a gas giant it is often referred to as an ice giant because it has water, ammonia, and methane ice crystals in its atmosphere. Is that how Neptune indicates it could help the Earth? Does that mean we are supposed to sow the Earth atmosphere with water, ammonia, and methane ice crystals in that they might cause the excess heat retaining carbon dioxide gas in the atmosphere to condense such that it would fall to the ground as a solid or liquid, at least the carbon in the carbon dioxide gas so as to prevent global warming? This would be related to the science of cloud seeding. The British are developing wind powered cloud seeding yachts that can combat global warming. See the following video about this:
To see the origin of the neptune equation, visit the following blog post:
http://eanbardsley.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/ian-beardsley/
or read it at the end of this post.
The Cause of the Neptune Equation
The Cause of the sequences in my work The Exciting Neptune Saga that give birth to The Neptune Equation are more than likely due to orbital resonances that were in the protoplanetary clould disc that gave rise to the Solar System.
I am currently pursuing a derivation in the origin of these sequences that give rise to the neptune equation in the study of the science of the evolution of the protoplanetary cloud and the formation of the earth and the planets.
What reason is there to hypothesize that Neptune could have something to do with the earth. Gaia hypothesis by James Lovelock hypothesizes that the earth is like an organism where its various aspects change to adjust to changes so as to maintain its health.
As far as Gaia Hypothesis goes, I really think it may be a good idea to look at the solar system and beyond (stars and galaxies) to understand the Earth as the Gaia presented in Gaia Hypothesis.
Here is the origin of the neptune equation (from The Exciting Neptune Saga):
Where Mythology Meets Science: An ill reputed manuscript by Ian Beardsley
Chapter 49: The Road From Ebla
Leonard followed the story of the 33 Chilean miners who were trapped 2000 feet below the earth in a dark cavern for over two months after their mine exit had collapsed. These miners remained courageous, brave, and held onto their humanity throughout the whole ordeal. To Leonard, these men showed what the human spirit was capable of.
The government of Chile responded to the emergency with great organization and did a great job. The coping techniques and space food to the miners was provided by the United States Space Agency, NASA. It was a marvel of engineering the capsule NASA engineered that brought the miners to the surface. He admired NASA greatly, because of this, because they represented such a positive force in the world, as was demonstrated in the rescue of the miners. There were 33 miners trapped down there, and 33 years of age was the age they say Jesus died and was resurrected. NASA and the spirit and strength of the miners were like a salvation.
Yet, the president of the United States had recently shut down NASA as the agency that would send man into space, and had decided to contract the building of spacecraft to private industry. Leonard thought this was a mistake. NASA, and the ESA (European Space Agency) were the most positive forces in his life.
Since Leonard had begun working on his project several years back, he always felt the planet Neptune held the answer to the salvation of the Earth because of its vivacious, lively, incandescent blue. During the ordeal of the miners, he was thinking about the equation he had developed that he thought was most important, and finally he saw how it showed he was correct. That Neptune held the key to the survival of Humanity. Just as the last (33rd) miner was being pulled out from the collapsed mine and to the surface of the Earth, he had finished writing what he had discovered. He wrote in his Journal as follows:
We have an equation for a sequence that shows the Earth straddled between Venus and Mars. Venus is a failed Earth. Mars promises to be New Earth. The equation, that I presented in my work, “The Document”, is:
[(Venus-orbit)/(Earth-orbit)][(Earth-mass)/(Mars-mass)]n – (Mars orbital #) = a_n
The Mars orbital number is 4. If we want to know what planet in the solar system holds the key to the success of Earth, or to the success of humans, we let n =3 since the Earth is the third planet out from the Sun, in the equation and the result is a_n = 17.6. This means the planet that holds the key is Neptune. It has a mass of 17.23 earth masses, a number very close to our 17.6. The next step is to analyze Neptune, its composition and other factors.
He thought he must have been blind. Not only was Neptune the indicated planet, he found it had nearly the same surface gravity of earth. Though it was much more massive than earth, it was much larger and therefore less dense. That was why it came out to have the same surface gravity.
Neptune belongs to what one could categorize as a family of planets. The categorization is done by noticing four planets including Neptune have a similar inclination to their orbit. These Four planets are Neptune, Saturn, Earth, and Mars. Earth is the planet where humans originated, Mars promises to be New Earth. It is appropriate that Neptune is in this family of planets because we must set sail upon the cosmic ocean for Mars from Earth, to survive as a species, and Neptune is the Sea God in Roman mythology, which corresponds to Poseidon in Greek mythology. Neptune carried a trident. Kurt Beardsley has told the tale of the Tuareg people, a tribe of the Algerian desert who bears the trident as their symbol from a time before oceans receded there leaving behind desert. It is believed, as he has said, there is an ancient lost library in the mountains they take to, second only to that of Alexandria and holding ancient undiscovered manuscripts.
Where does the Neptune equation come from? The following Sequences:
Chapter 24: The Document
Salvoretti had done it. The structure of the solar system and dynamic elements of the Universe and Nature in general were tied up in the two sequences:
5, 14, 23, 32,…
and
1.8, 3.6, 5.4, 7.2,…
Could he find the connection between the two to localize the pivotal point of the solar system? Yes he could, he took their difference, subtracting respective terms in the second sequence from those in the first sequence to obtain the new sequence:
3.2, 10.4, 17.6, 24.8,…
Which is an arithmetic sequence with common difference of 7.2 meaning it is written
7.2n – 4 = a_n
The a_n is the nth term of the sequence, n is the number of the term in the sequence.
This he noticed could be written:
[(Venus-orbit)/(Earth-orbit)][(Earth-mass)/(Mars-mass)]n – (Mars orbital #) = a_n
Here is where some of the sequences come from:
The Search For The Tarot: Chapter 16
Salvoretti began writing in his journal:
We originally thought that 1.8 (9/5) occurred in the solar system and nature, alone. It is the ratio of Saturn orbit to Jupiter orbit in their closest approaches to the sun. It is the ratio of the solar radius to the lunar orbit. It is ratio of the molar mass of gold to that of silver. Then I discovered that approximately twice that value (3.7) was recurrent throughout the solar system and nature. Twice 1.8 is 3.6. I found it occurred in Jupiter, Saturn, Earth, Mercury, and Venus to name a few as 3.7. Now I have found it in Neptune and Uranus.
It occurs here to me we are not just dealing with 1.8 and 3.7, but any whole number multiple of 1.8. We are dealing with: a_n=1.8n
Let us try three times 1.8. It is 5.4. Immediately we see it in the most obvious, Jupiter. It is the largest and most massive planet in the solar system. Its furthest distance from the sun in its orbit is 5.455 AU ~ 5.4.
We see it in the following
(saturn mass)/(neptune mass)=(95.147)/(17.23)=5.522~5.4
I have already noted that Saturn and Neptune have similar inclinations to their orbit that are only common to Earth and Mars.
Thus we are dealing here with the sequence:
1.8, 3.6, 5.4, 7.2,…
Furthermore;
[(venus orbit)/(earth orbit)][(earth mass)/(mars mass)] = 7.2
Some of the most interesting occurrences of 3.7 in nature are:
[(volume of saturn)/(volume of Jupiter)](volume of mars)
=(mercury radius)(earth radius)^2
=[(venus orbit/earth orbit)(earth radius)]^3
=[(mercury orbit)/(earth orbit)](earth radius)^3
=0.37 cubic earth radii
0.37 can be converted to 3.7 by multiplying it by the ratio of earth mass to mars mass because it is close to ten.
(earth radius)/(moon radius)=
4(degrees in a circle)(moon distance)/(sun distance)
= 3.7
There are about as many days in a year as degrees in a circle
And to bring in the archaeology, since this is cosmic archaeology, my brother, Kurt Beardsley, may have a clue as to where some of the answers can be found in The Exciting Neptune Saga in the following interview I did with him (Bear in mind the sea god Neptune carried a trident):
Since ammonia ice crystals crystalize at -33 degrees centigrade, perhaps we are merely looking at the reaction of ammonia with carbon dioxide, though it may be that spraying the atmosphere with the cool ammonia ice crystals is that which is desired, for however long they remain ice crystals. Thus, we must consider the reaction between ammonia (NH3) and carbon dioxide (CO2):
Urea is made from ammonia and carbon dioxide:
2NH3 + CO2 --> NH2COONH4 (ammonium carbamate)
NH2COONH4 --> H2O + NH2CONH2 (urea),...
Ammonium carbonate is a form of salt used as a nitrogen fertilizer.
It may be we are supposed to use ammonium carbamate to attract water droplets in the atmosphere to form highly reflective clouds that would reflect large amounts of sunlight back into space.
I am still not sure exactly why the planet neptune may hold the answer to the success of the earth, so this idea of water, methane and ammonia ice crystals injected into the atmosphere is just speculation.
It may be that they would cool the atmosphere, but for any permanent solution, it would seem to me we have to find a way of getting have to get large amounts of heat retaining carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. Whatever the method, I feel we have to look at the planet Neptune for ideas of of doing this. This would fall under the discipline of geoengineering.
The Levinson-Asimov-Clarke Phenomenon and Fred Hoyle
I seem to have found evidence in support of the belief of that great English Astronomer, Fred Hoyle. He seems to have believed that humans are part of a plan, part of a process, common to life throughout the Universe. He further believed that it was clear by looking at the Earth.
He likened humanity to going down a raging river, having no idea what we will encounter, we have no idea what to do, our destiny is out of our hands, but by virtue of the plan we had oil, a most useful form of energy that gave us control over our situation and allowed us to develop to some level of sophistication. He wrote:
“How much coal and oil can you expect to find on a planet, not just the Earth, but on any one of the multitude of planets?…Not, I think, enormously more than on the Earth. Perhaps ten times more in favorable cases, but any planet too heavily loaded with such materials would tend to be unstable. It follows that intelligent creatures, evolving on any planet, will run into the same problems of fuel exhaustion – exhaustion of coal and oil – that we shall encounter in the next century our two.”
He continues:
“We already know what will have to be done about that: we must change our energy source to nuclear reactions, uranium, thorium, or perhaps fusion of deuterium.”
And here is where he suggests we are part of a plan:
“It has been a very long step from the first crude charcoal smelting to a nuclear reactor. We ourselves have managed this step in about six or seven thousand years. A major fraction of the way has indeed been achieved in two or three centuries. Could we have made our discoveries at a more leisurely pace than this? No, we could not. The pace of discovery had to be very fast, otherwise all the coal and oil would have been gone before the advent of nuclear physics.”
He then points out if we fail, no other species can take over and succeed because there are only enough resources for one try: “This is a one shot affair. If we fail, this planetary system fails so far as intelligence is concerned.”
I wrote in a fictional story the following passage that reveals humans as part of a plan, but not as revealed by oil on earth, but rather by the structure of the solar system, and chemical elements:
The Coupling of Mars and Earth
Salvoretti and Tara are discussing things as they drive back to Turin.
Salvoretti: “Tara, I can’t get over what you said earlier that two of the Pythagorean Solids have volumes, one of nine tetrahedra and the other of five tetrahedra. There are only five Pythagorean solids and two of them have volumes the same numbers as the distance to Jupiter and Saturn in their closest approaches to the sun if the earth is at one unit from the sun! This means the tetrahedron represents the earth because it has a volume of one. This is interesting because the solar radius to the earth-moon distance is 9 to 5, and 9 to 5 is the molar mass of gold to the molar mass of silver.”
“Why is this so incredible? It is incredible because the tetrahedron also has four faces and Mars is the fourth planet. It is appropriate that the tetrahedron couples earth and mars, further, in that it is four faced (mars is the fourth planet from the sun), and each face has three vertices (earth is the third planet from the sun). You may not think that is incredible but consider categorizing the planets with the smallest abundant number, twelve. Smallest abundant number means it is the most divisible for its size. Twelve is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 a whole number of times. The sum of these numbers is 16, which is greater than 12. Mars is the fourth planet out from the sun. Twelve divided by four is three, and the earth is the third planet out from the sun. Thus once again the earth and Mars are coupled.”
“I can couple them again. Elements are atoms, and the numbers of particles that constitute them determine the element, and its relative mass, or “molar mass” as it is called. The atmosphere of Mars is mostly CO2, about 95 percent. The earth atmosphere is more than 90 percent oxygen and nitrogen. I calculate CO2 to have a molar mass of 44.01 and earth air to have a molar mass of 28.5756. The Mars orbital distance compared to the earth orbital distance is about 1.5. The molar mass of CO2 compared to the molar mass of air is about 1.5. That is the mars-sun distance is to the earth-sun distance as Martian air is to earth air.”
“It goes further than that. If the earth surface gravity is 1, that of Mars is 0.380. That is a ratio of 2.63. The molar mass of oxygen gas (O2) what we breath, is 32.00. The molar mass of carbon, the basis of life as we know it, is 12.01. That is a ratio of 2.66. That says it takes about the same energy to lift a mole of carbon on earth, as it does to lift a mole of oxygen (O2) on mars the same distance.”
“Earth and Mars are yet further coupled:”
“The earth atmosphere was once mostly carbon dioxide (CO2) like the mars atmosphere is today, until plant life came along and started converting the carbon dioxide into oxygen, using light from the sun and in the process making the most fundamental sugar, glucose (which is at the bottom of the food chain). A process called photosynthesis.”
“Glucose is C6H12O6. I calculate glucose has a molar mass of 180.16 and water, which covers most of the surface of the earth, chemical formula H2O, I calculate has a molar mass of 18.016.”
“180.16 divided by 18.016 is about 10 and the earth is about 10 times as massive as mars. That is, glucose is to water as the earth mass is to the mass of mars.”
“You are probably wondering why I am so amazed that Mars and earth are so coupled empirically. Well the planet Mercury is too hot to support human life because it is so close to the sun, Venus has the same problem. But the earth is the next planet out and the right distance from the sun to be not too warm to support life._The next planet after the earth is Mars, and it may be cold, but not too cold to colonize, or even one day terraform (make habitable for humans). The next planet after Mars is Jupiter, not just too cold, but mostly gas, so there is nothing solid to stand on. The next planet, Saturn, even colder and mostly gaseous as well. The trend continues on to Neptune and Uranus. Pluto is just this cold little dwarf planet, whose thin atmosphere collapses when it is further from the sun.”
“You see then why I am so amazed Mars and earth are coupled by these numbers, they actually have one thing in common, solid planets, not climatically too hot for humans, or too cold.”
“These numbers that couple Mars with earth, seem to say the planet is there as a stepping stone to the stars, that it is time to wade out into the cosmic ocean, to use the metaphor of Carl Sagan, or sink. That is, for some reason we have what we need, but a challenge has been put to us. We have to overcome our problems, like spending money and resources on war instead of space exploration. Space exploration can solve the economic crisis. Colonizing Mars would generate a massive industry that would create work here on earth in every sector, for everyone, and, it would all be paid for by the resources that are out there in the solar system. As Cabal says to Passworthy in Things to come by H.G. Wells:”
““And if we’re no more than animals, we must snatch each little scrap of happiness, and live, and suffer, and pass, mattering no more than all the other animals do or have done. It is this, or that. All the universe or nothing. Which shall it be Passworthy? Which shall it be?””
“I believe we are at that time in history, and the NanoFET marks it. Brian Gilchrist is working on the NanoFET idea. Field Effect Transistors are used to charge light nanoparticles, so they can be ejected out the back end of a ship with a series of magnetic fields made by stacks of microchip components, much the same way charged particles are accelerated by electromagnets in a particle accelerator. The nanoFET ship can reach 90% the speed of light, theoretically, if built light and outside the earth’s gravity. Of course the ship is a starship that would take more than four years to reach the nearest star, but used to go to mars might only take a couple hours or so.”
Fred Hoyle goes on to say:
“Here I have argued that the most remarkable phase in the history of our species, that in which we are now living, the upsurge from a primitive Stone Age to a sophisticated culture and technology, is not just a chance affair. Things must go this way. We are following an inevitable path, one that must have been followed by many, many times on the other planets.”
He continues:
“If in other places other species have already followed the difficult route ahead of us, then plainly it would be an enormous advantage to know exactly where the dangers lie. My suspicion is that ample information exists in what I call a “galactic library” to show exactly what is going to happen to us if the world persists in following current policies.”
I feel I am tapping into a galactic library, but not being written by extraterrestrials, but rather written in nature and as well embedded in the works of certain science fiction writers, when I write:
I can say this. There are two possibilities:
We are either validating the time wave theory of Terrence McKenna which
says either:
1) time ends in 2012 (wouldn't be fun)
2) a new reality begins in 2012
3) we invent time travel in 2012 so that is why the McKenna timewave does not work past 2012.
Or we are constructing a new timewave based on the science fiction of Levinson, Asimov and Clarke because their trajectory can be substantiated by a structure we are finding in the universe, and the upside is it has no end, but rather suggests we will have hyperdrive by 2042 to 2044 and with that it secures the future of humankind into eternity.
And in nature when I write:
But let us ask again, which of the above two alternatives will be the case. I have found in other research that I have done, an equation that shows earth positioned between success and failure, an equation we can call “The Neptune Equation”. It indicates that the planet Neptune may hold the key to whether the earth is successful, or fails. The equation and how I arrived at it can be found in the following passage,
To read my full manuscript, visit the following link:
http://issuu.com/eanbardsley/docs/three_books_and_cover
0 comments:
Post a Comment